Interoperability among hospitals treating populations that have been marginalized.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether differences in hospital interoperability are related to the extent to which hospitals treat groups that have been economically and socially marginalized. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: Data on 2393 non-federal acute care hospitals in the United States from the American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement fielded in 2021, the 2019 Medicare Cost Report, and the 2019 Social Deprivation Index. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We identified five proxy measures related to marginalization and assessed the relationship between those measures and the likelihood that hospitals engaged in all four domains of interoperable information exchange and participated in national interoperability networks in cross-sectional analysis. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In unadjusted analysis, hospitals that treated patients from zip codes with high social deprivation were 33% less likely to engage in interoperable exchange (Relative Risk = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58-0.76) and 24% less likely to participate in a national network than all other hospitals (RR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.87). Critical Access Hospitals (CAH) were 24 percent less likely to engage in interoperable exchange (RR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69-0.83) but not less likely to participate in a national network (RR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.88-1.06). No difference was detected for 2 measures (high Disproportionate Share Hospital percentage and Medicaid case mix) while 1 was associated with a greater likelihood to engage (high uncompensated care burden). The association between social deprivation and interoperable exchange persisted in an analysis examining metropolitan and rural areas separately and in adjusted analyses accounting for hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that treat patients from areas with high social deprivation were less likely to engage in interoperable exchange than other hospitals, but other measures were not associated with lower interoperability. The use of area deprivation data may be important to monitor and address hospital clinical data interoperability disparities to avoid related health care disparities.

Relative Productivity of For-Profit Hospitals: A Big or a Little Deal?

This study asks: Does the empirical evidence support the conclusion that for-profit (FP) hospitals are more productive or efficient than private not-for-profit (NFP) hospitals or non-federal public (PUB) hospitals? Alternative theories of NFP behavior are described. Our review of individual empirical hospital studies of quality, service mix, community benefit, and cost/efficiency in the United States published since 2000 indicates that no systematic difference exists in cost/efficiency, provision of uncompensated care, and quality of care. But FPs are more likely to provide profitable services, higher service intensity, have lower shares of uninsured and Medicaid patients, and are more responsive to external financial incentives. That FP hospitals are not more efficient runs counter to property rights theory, but their relative responsiveness to financial incentives supports it. There is little evidence that FP market presence changes NFP behaviors. Observed differences between FP and NFP hospitals are mostly a "little deal."

Influence of Not-for-Profit Hospital Ownership Type on Community Benefit and Charity Care.

Non-profit hospitals are expected to provide charity care and other community benefits to adjust their tax exemption status. Using the Medicare Hospital Cost Report, American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the American Community Survey datasets, we examined if church-affiliated hospitals spent more on charity care and community benefit. For this analysis, we defined five main categories of community benefits were measured: total community benefit; charity care; Medicaid shortfall; unreimbursed other means-tested services; and the total of unreimbursed education and unfunded research. Multiple regression was used to examine the effect of church ownership, controlling for other factors, on the level of community benefit in 2644 general acute care non-profit hospitals. Descriptive analyses and multiple regression were used to show the relationship between the provision of community benefits and church affiliation including Catholic (CH), other church-affiliated hospitals (OCAH), and non-church affiliated hospitals (NCAH). The non-profit hospital on average spent 6.5% of its total expenses on community benefits. NCAH spent 6.09%, CH spent 7.5%, and OCAH spent 9.4%. Non-profits spent 2.8% of their total expenses on charity care, with the highest charity care spending for OCAH (5.2%), followed by CH (3.9%), and NCAH (2.4%). Regression results showed that CH and OCAH, on average, spent 1.08% and 2.16% more on community benefits than NCAHs. In addition, CH and OCAH spent more on other categories of community benefits except for education and research. Church-affiliated hospitals spend more on community benefits and charity care than non-church affiliated nonprofit hospitals.

Variation And Changes In The Targeting Of Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments.

Little is known about how Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments, which are intended to support hospitals that serve low-income patients, are allocated or whether allocation patterns have changed over time. We employed alternative definitions of targeting, or the degree to which allocations were made in a manner consistent with the statutory goals and intent of the program, to examine disproportionate share hospital payment allocations in forty-nine participating states. The most recent data indicate that 57.2 percent of acute care hospitals received disproportionate share hospital payments, totaling more than $14.5 billion, in 2015. The majority of payments went to hospitals with Medicaid shares above the state-specific median (89.1 percent), hospitals with uncompensated care shares above the state-specific median (60.6 percent), or hospitals deemed as disproportionate share per statutory definitions (64.6 percent). However, among all hospitals receiving these payments, up to 31.6 percent of payments were allocated to hospitals that did not meet a given definition, and 3.2 percent went to hospitals that met none of them. These findings suggest that although the majority of the payments were targeted to hospitals serving low-income patients, opportunities exist to better align allocation with statutory goals and intent or to revise applicable statute.

Association Between Medicaid Expansion And Closure Of Hospital-Based Obstetric Services.

Access to obstetric services has declined steadily during the past decade, driven by the closure of hospital-based obstetric units and of entire hospitals. A fundamental challenge to maintaining obstetric services is that they are frequently unprofitable for hospitals to operate, threatening hospital viability. Medicaid expansion has emerged as a possible remedy for obstetric service closure because it reduces uncompensated care and improves hospital finances. Using national hospital data from the period 2010-18, we assessed the relationship between Medicaid expansion and obstetric service closure in rural and urban communities. We found that expansion led to a large reduction in hospital closures; however, this effect was concentrated among hospitals that did not have obstetric units. Considering closure of obstetric units, we found that rural obstetric units were less likely to close immediately after expansion, but this effect faded within two years. Overall, our findings suggest that Medicaid expansion had little effect on the closure of obstetric services. Policies supporting access to obstetric care may need to directly address the financial challenges specific to this service line.

State Regulation and Hospital Community Benefit Spending in Medicaid Expansion States.

CONTEXT: Previous studies show that nonprofit hospital spending on charity care declined in Medicaid expansion states. We test whether state community benefit regulations mitigated the decline in charity care spending. METHODS: We use a fixed effects model to evaluate the association between state regulations and nonprofit hospital community benefit spending and its subcategories as a share of total expenses in Medicaid expansion states. We obtained community benefit spending data from the Internal Revenue Service Form 990 Schedule H filings of 1,738 hospitals in 44 states and the District of Columbia from 2010 to 2017. We determine the stringency of state regulations by comparing the provisions of state and federal requirements based on regulation information compiled by the Hilltop Institute. FINDINGS: State minimum community benefit requirements are associated with increased community benefit and charity care spending by nonprofit hospitals in Medicaid expansion states. CONCLUSIONS: States that imposed minimum community benefit requirements on nonprofit hospitals did not experience a decline in charity care spending after Medicaid expansion. The results suggest state minimum community benefit rules may expand the provision of community benefit and charitable care spending.

Financial impacts of the Medicaid expansion on community health centers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impacts of the Medicaid expansion on revenues, costs, assets, and liabilities of federally funded community health centers. DATA SOURCES: We combined data from the Uniform Data System, Internal Revenue Service nonprofit tax returns, and county-level characteristics from the Census Bureau. Our final dataset included 5841 center-year observations. STUDY DESIGN: We used difference-in-differences model to estimate the fiscal impacts of the Medicaid expansion on community health centers. We employed event study models, state-specific trend models, and placebo law tests as robustness checks. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: On the revenue side, we found a $2.08 million relative increase (p = 0.002) in Medicaid revenues, offset by a $0.44 million decrease (p = 0.015) in total grants among community health centers in expansion states compared with centers in non-expansion states. On the expenditure side, we found a large but not statistically significant $0.98 million relative increase (p = 0.201) in total expenditures among centers in expansion states. Uncompensated care for health centers in expansion states decreased by $1.19 million (p < 0.001) relative to their counterparts in non-expansion states. CONCLUSIONS: Community health centers in expansion states benefited from the increased, stable revenue stream from Medicaid expansions. While Medicaid revenue increased as a result of the policy, we find no major evidence of substitution away from other revenue lines, with one notable exception (i.e., substitution away from state and local government grants). From a policy perspective, these results are encouraging as the Biden Administration starts to implement the safety-net enhancements from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and as more non-expansion states are considering opting into Medicaid expansions. It is anticipated that these added revenue streams will help to sustain health centers in the delivery of health care services to the underserved population.

Comparing the value of community benefit and Tax-Exemption in non-profit hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the characteristics of non-profit hospitals providing more community benefits and charity care than value of their tax exemptions and how this relationship changed between 2011 and 2018. DATA SOURCES: Primary dataset was schedule H Form IRS 990 data. This data was merged with the American Hospital Association, Medicare Hospital Cost Report, and the America Community Survey. STUDY DESIGN: We measured six categories of tax benefits and 17 types of community benefits. Subtracting the average value of community benefits provided by for-profit hospitals, we computed incremental community benefit and charity care provided by each non-profit hospital. EXTRACTION METHODS: A nationally representative sample was created of 11 776 non-profit hospital-year observations from 1472 unique hospitals over the 2011 to 2018 period was created. Descriptive analyses and random effect logistic regression were used to show associations between hospital characteristics and difference between incremental net community benefits and the value of tax-exemption. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: After adjusting for community benefits provided by for-profits hospitals, on average, non-profit hospitals spent 5.9% (CI: 5.8%-6.0%) of their total expenses on community benefits; 1.3% (CI: 1.2%-1.3%) on charity care; and received 4.3% (CI: 4.2%-4.4%) of total expenses in tax exemptions. A total of 38.5% of non-profit hospitals did not provide more community benefit and 86% did not provide more charity care than the value of their tax exemption. Hospitals with fewer beds, providing residency education and located in high poverty communities were more likely to provide more incremental community benefits and charity care than the value of their tax exemption, while system affiliation had a negative association. CONCLUSION: The amount of community benefits and charity care provided by non-profits varied substantially across non-profit hospitals. Establishing minimum requirements for non-profit hospitals or publicly ranking hospitals based on their community benefit or charity care contributions, could encourage greater community benefits and charity care.

Does Medicaid expansion influence county health spending? A case of New York counties.

We investigated the impacts of Medicaid expansion on New York county total health spending and specifics of health spending, including health services, public health facilities and public health administration. Little research considered the financial effect of Medicaid expansion on local governments while well reported are its influences on uninsured rates and health services utilization. New York counties have contributed to health in their boundaries by providing or funding public health services, and supporting a part of the non-federal share of Medicaid expenditures and uncompensated care. Medicaid expansion can reduce the size of county expenditures for health by enrolling more previously uninsured population in the program and offering more generous federal funding for the expanded Medicaid. We offer empirical evidence that Medicaid expansion was associated with reduced county health spending.

Measuring the COVID-19 Financial Threat to Hospital Markets.

Many hospitals have been straining under the financial stress of treating COVID-19 patients. Those experiencing the greatest strain are in markets burdened with high levels of debt and uncompensated care. We propose a new measure of financial risk in a hospital market, combining both pre-existing financial vulnerability and COVID-19 severity. It reveals the highest concentrations of risk in counties with high poverty, low population density, and high shares of foreign-born and non-White populations. The CARES Act Provider Relief Fund helped many of the hospitals in these regions, but it left many markets with the same overall vulnerability to financial strain from the next health crisis.

340B Drug Pricing Program and hospital provision of uncompensated care.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether hospital entry into the 340B Drug Pricing Program, which entitles eligible hospitals to discounts on drug purchases and intends for hospitals to use associated savings to devote more resources to the care of low-income populations, is associated with changes in hospital provision of uncompensated care. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed secondary data on 340B participation and uncompensated care provision among general acute care hospitals and critical access hospitals from 2003 to 2015. We constructed an annual, hospital-level data set on hospital 340B participation from the Office of Pharmacy Information Systems and on uncompensated care provision from the Hospital Cost Reporting Information System. METHODS: Focusing on 2 periods of program expansion, we separately analyzed trends in uncompensated care costs for 340B-eligible general acute care hospitals and critical access hospitals, stratified by year of 340B program entry, including a stratum of eligible hospitals that never participated. We used a differences-in-differences approach to quantify whether there were differential changes in provision of uncompensated care after hospitals enter the 340B program relative to hospitals that did not participate or had not yet entered. RESULTS: We do not find evidence that hospitals increased provision of uncompensated care after entry into the 340B program differentially more than hospitals that never entered or had not yet entered the program. CONCLUSIONS: Relying on hospitals to invest surplus into care for the underserved without marginal incentives to do so or strong oversight may not be an effective strategy to expand safety-net care.

Immunity from Civil Liability, Part 2.

What nurses should understand in times of crisis.

Charity Care Needs To Be Better Than This.

After a costly hospital stay, an uninsured patient's family rushes to navigate an unclear system of charity care.

Medicaid Expansion Reduced Uncompensated Care Costs At Louisiana Hospitals; May Be A Model For Other States.

We examined changes in hospital uncompensated care costs in the context of Louisiana's Medicaid expansion. Louisiana remains the only state in the Deep South to have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act and can serve as a model for states that have not adopted expansion, many of which are located in the South census region. We found that Medicaid expansion was associated with a 33 percent reduction in the share of total operating expenses attributable to uncompensated care costs for general medical and surgical hospitals in Louisiana in the first three years after expansion. Reductions varied by hospital type, with larger effects found for rural and public hospitals versus urban and for-profit or private nonprofit hospitals. As hospital operating expenses consistently increased during the sample period, our results imply that hospitals in Louisiana are treating fewer patients for whom no reimbursement was provided since the state expanded Medicaid.

Implementation of a pharmacist-led transitions of care program in an indigent care clinic: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacists' involvement in the transitions of care has shown the potential to decrease readmissions and increase access to care in many populations; however, the uninsured patient populations have not been studied. The evidence for the feasibility of implementing transitions of care services in indigent care clinics with limited resources also remains limited. The objectives were to implement a pharmacist-led transitions of care program in an indigent care clinic, to demonstrate the feasibility of its implementation, and to evaluate its impact on readmissions and emergency department (ED) visit rates among an uninsured population. METHODS: The study was a single-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial implemented in an indigent care clinic in the Southeast region of the United States from October 2018 to July 2019. Eligible patients were those older than 18 years, uninsured, English-speaking, diagnosed with any condition, and recently discharged from a local community hospital within the past 16 days. The primary outcome was the hospital readmission rate at 30 days after discharge. The secondary outcomes included 60- and 90-day readmission rates in addition to 30-, 60-, and 90-day ED visit rates. RESULTS: A total of 88 participants were recruited. The intervention was successfully implemented in the clinic, but patient-level barriers to follow-ups included transportation, accessibility, financial burdens, inconsistent telephone communication, and a lack of knowledge about the importance of follow-ups. At 30 days postdischarge, 13.64% of the patients in the usual care group experienced readmissions compared with 9.30% of the patients in the intervention group. The relative change in the 30-day readmission rates between the usual care and the intervention groups was 1.7 (rate ratio [RR] 1.69 [95% CI 0.47-6.08]). The RRs were insignificant for the 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmission and ED visit rates. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of implementing transitions of care services in a clinic with limited resources by pharmacists. The intervention showed promising results by reducing readmission rates.

Changes in the balance between formal and informal care supply in England between 2001 and 2011: evidence from census data.

Informal care plays a crucial role in the social care system in England and is increasingly recognised as a cornerstone of future sustainability of the long-term care (LTC) system. This paper explores the variation in informal care provision over time, and in particular, whether the considerable reduction in publicly-funded formal LTC after 2008 had an impact on the provision of informal care. We used small area data from the 2001 and 2011 English censuses to measure the prevalence and intensity (i.e. the number of hours of informal care provided) of informal care in the population. We controlled for changes in age structure, health, deprivation, income, employment and education. The effects of the change in formal social care provision on informal care were analysed through instrumental variable models to account for the well-known endogeneity. We found that informal care provision had increased over the period, particularly among high-intensity carers (20+ hours per week). We also found that the reduction in publicly-funded formal care provision was associated with significant increases in high-intensity (20+ hours per week) informal care provision, suggesting a substitutive relationship between formal and informal care of that intensity in the English system.